<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DIC to the Rescue!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valuesaustralia.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valuesaustralia.com/blog/?p=256</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:28:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Club Troppo &#187; Missing Link - Saturday 28 July 2007</title>
		<link>http://valuesaustralia.com/blog/?p=256&#038;cpage=1#comment-7451</link>
		<dc:creator>Club Troppo &#187; Missing Link - Saturday 28 July 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 05:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valuesaustralia.com/blog/?p=256#comment-7451</guid>
		<description>[...] First, Dr Haneef.Â  Colin Campbell categorises the whole affair as a &#8220;a disaster from start to finish&#8221; and wonders how the Australian Tourism Commercial, &#8220;Where the Bloody Hell Are You?&#8221; will go down in India right now.Â  &#8220;Roger Migently&#8221; can&#8217;t decide whether he&#8217;s more unimpressed with the efforts of the Howard government, DPP Damian Bugg or Kevin Rudd over the Haneef affair, having earlier succinctly summarised the apparently intended effect of the anti-terrorist legislation under which Haneef was charged: [T]he terrorist legislation implicitly requires you to satisfy yourself that anyone to whom you provide a service, item or product of any kind which might conceivably be deemed at some future time as a â€œresourceâ€ which might conceivably be used in a terrorist act by a terrorist or a terrorist organisation, or what might conceivably be deemed a terrorist organisation, at some indeterminate time in the future - you are required, as we say, to satisfy yourself that the person or organisation to whom you provide such a â€œresourceâ€ is not, or may not in the future be, a terrorist or terrorist organisation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First, Dr Haneef.Â  Colin Campbell categorises the whole affair as a &#8220;a disaster from start to finish&#8221; and wonders how the Australian Tourism Commercial, &#8220;Where the Bloody Hell Are You?&#8221; will go down in India right now.Â  &#8220;Roger Migently&#8221; can&#8217;t decide whether he&#8217;s more unimpressed with the efforts of the Howard government, DPP Damian Bugg or Kevin Rudd over the Haneef affair, having earlier succinctly summarised the apparently intended effect of the anti-terrorist legislation under which Haneef was charged: [T]he terrorist legislation implicitly requires you to satisfy yourself that anyone to whom you provide a service, item or product of any kind which might conceivably be deemed at some future time as a â€œresourceâ€ which might conceivably be used in a terrorist act by a terrorist or a terrorist organisation, or what might conceivably be deemed a terrorist organisation, at some indeterminate time in the future &#8211; you are required, as we say, to satisfy yourself that the person or organisation to whom you provide such a â€œresourceâ€ is not, or may not in the future be, a terrorist or terrorist organisation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
