<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Black Breath of the Nazg&#251;l</title>
	<atom:link href="http://valuesaustralia.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://valuesaustralia.com/blog/?p=254</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 04:51:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Australian Values</title>
		<link>http://valuesaustralia.com/blog/?p=254&#038;cpage=1#comment-7231</link>
		<dc:creator>Australian Values</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valuesaustralia.com/blog/?p=254#comment-7231</guid>
		<description>[...] Black Breath of the Nazg&#251;l [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Black Breath of the Nazg&ucirc;l [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Club Troppo &#187; Missing Link (delayed, again)</title>
		<link>http://valuesaustralia.com/blog/?p=254&#038;cpage=1#comment-7190</link>
		<dc:creator>Club Troppo &#187; Missing Link (delayed, again)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valuesaustralia.com/blog/?p=254#comment-7190</guid>
		<description>[...] Harry Clarke, however, thinks that the press and the left-wing blogosphere should give the Haneef issue a break. James Ozark has also had enough of what he describes as &#8220;our latest leftist cause celeb&#8221;. But undeterred, &#8220;Roger Migently&#8221; focuses on the Crimes Act provisions under which Haneef was charged, reaching an interesting conclusion. Legal Eagle muses about whether unflattering artist&#8217;s images of Dr Haneef might be contempt of court. And David Tiley weighs in with a passionate piece focussing on the now denied claims that Dr Haneef was allegedly planning to blow up or fly a plane into a very tall Gold Coast apartment block, also pointing out that odious little twerp Kevin Andrews has also cancelled Haneef&#8217;s wife&#8217;s visa so she can&#8217;t even return to Australia with their new baby: I imagine they have done this because she would play well on the TV news, holding her tiny baby and begging the government to stop torturing her husband. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Harry Clarke, however, thinks that the press and the left-wing blogosphere should give the Haneef issue a break. James Ozark has also had enough of what he describes as &#8220;our latest leftist cause celeb&#8221;. But undeterred, &#8220;Roger Migently&#8221; focuses on the Crimes Act provisions under which Haneef was charged, reaching an interesting conclusion. Legal Eagle muses about whether unflattering artist&#8217;s images of Dr Haneef might be contempt of court. And David Tiley weighs in with a passionate piece focussing on the now denied claims that Dr Haneef was allegedly planning to blow up or fly a plane into a very tall Gold Coast apartment block, also pointing out that odious little twerp Kevin Andrews has also cancelled Haneef&#8217;s wife&#8217;s visa so she can&#8217;t even return to Australia with their new baby: I imagine they have done this because she would play well on the TV news, holding her tiny baby and begging the government to stop torturing her husband. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
