Monckton’s Shield
The Climate Change Insurance Scam
At Sir Roger’s boarding school [all right, that's enough of that!] the interhouse swimming competition was called the Monckton Shield.
Sir Roger’s nightmares used to be full of the horror of the only event in which he ever stood a chance – underwater distance swimming, or the Open “How Long Can You Hold Your Breath Before Your Lungs Burst Underwater Torture”. Sir Roger (he was merely The Hon. Roger, back then, of course and the other boys were required to let him win) never managed to reach the other end of the Olympic Pool. But he did try very hard.
Well, there’s another Monckton nightmare and it’s called “Lord Christopher”, or “How Long Can You Hold a Ridiculous Pseudo-Scientific Conspiracy Theory Without the Entire World Realising How Crazy You Are Before Your Bubble Bursts?”
We were alerted to the nightmare by the cloyingly umble and insincerely obsequious Andrew (Uriah) Blot on our weekly torture session, The Insiders. Watching Insiders, like the water torture, the strongest, toughest and most highly trained typically scream (bubblingly) for mercy within 10-15 seconds.
Speaking of Andrew Blot reminds us of the day Sir Roger remonstrated with his youngest progeny, “You’re a blot on the family escutcheon!” “What’s an escutcheon?” he asked. His brother, the presumptive heir to the Migently Estates, replied, “It means you’ve got a small penis and no friends!” Which brings us nicely back to Andrew Blot.
Blot is a fierce defendant of Monckton because the Mad Monk, his new clingy-man-love-infatuation, is. (Blot is always infatuated with whoever is the leader of the conservative party and always makes anything except a serious, rational case in their favour. Is Blot perhaps the most intellectually dishonest “journalist” in Australia?)
So here is what Monckton – once science advisor to Margaret Thatcher (if anything should ring alarm bells . . .) – told an American audience was DEFINITELY going to happen in Copenhagen and why:
At [the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in] Copenhagen, this December, weeks away, a treaty will be signed. Your president will sign it. Most of the third world countries will sign it, because they think they’re going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regime from the European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won’t sign it.
I read that treaty. And what it says is this, that a world government is going to be created. The word “government” actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to third world countries, in satisfication of what is called, coyly, “climate debt” – because we’ve been burning CO2 and they haven’t. We’ve been screwing up the climate and they haven’t. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government, is enforcement.
How many of you think that the word “election” or “democracy” or “vote” or “ballot” occurs anywhere in the 200 pages of that treaty? Quite right, it doesn’t appear once. So, at last, the communists who piled out of the Berlin Wall and into the environmental movement, who took over Greenpeace so that my friends who funded it left within a year, because [the communists] captured it – Now the apotheosis as at hand. They are about to impose a communist world government on the world.
Yay! The Reds under our beds are back! It’s all a communist conspiracy! World government! Aaaaarghhh!!!! Bring back Ming!
UPDATE: Penny drops. Duh. Monckton is proselytising against climate change and is willing to peddle his nonsense, in fact to say anything, NOT because he believes the science is wrong but because he thinks it’s all a conspiracy to bring about communist world domination. His agenda isn’t climate change. It’s anti-communism.
But, by the way, WRONG! ON ALL COUNTS! The great oracle, soothsayer, prophet and fortune teller of the denialist front was 100% wrong about events that were supposed to unfold within just a few weeks. How wrong must he be about events that are years, decades, off?
Is Monckton “potty”?¹ You might be interested in this demolition of Monckton’s ideas and exposure of his massive lack of integrity.
Also on this morning’s horror show nightmare was the Mad Monk himself, trying to extricate himself from the contradiction of his fundamental climate denialism (“The climate change argument is absolute crap”, he told a country Victoria audience in October last year) while proposing a policy to deal with it. He seems to be going for a compromise: “on the insurance principle you are prepared to take reasonable precautions against significant potential risks”. Tony, just a note: “absolute” is non-negotiable. “Absolute” is absolute. Absolute crap means there is no truth in it whatever and there is no point in taking any measures against it.
While trying to distance himself from his “absolute crap” remark he made the same point he made in Victoria’s deep West (a bit like Tamworth, NSW, but with slightly more grazing on the knuckles): you may as well have an insurance policy against the non-existent threat to make the worry-wart wife and the communist-teacher-taught kids happy, but choose the cheapest, dodgiest policy on offer.
The trouble with this attitude is that it falls between two chairs. It is either too much or not enough and there is nothing whatever in between. Either action is “absolutely” unsatisfactory. If someone is threatening you with a sword, and they say they are aiming to slice you through the gizzards, you have a choice. Take a calculated risk that they are bluffing and do nothing, or prepare to jump 4 feet in the air. What Abbott is proposing is that we just split the difference and jump only 2 feet. Trouble with that is, when and if he strikes he’ll take you off at the knees. And you’ll lose your two feet. But, hey, Tony, I can see you now, scrabbling in the dirt, bellowing like the Black Knight, “‘Tis but a scratch!”
What Abbott and his followers and handlers need to understand is that the people who are managing the campaigns of climate denialism, climate scepticism and of climate uncertainty and obfuscation are having a lend of you for their own political and economic agendas and you’re too stupid to see it.
As George Monbiot says of people who have bought the unscientific, irrational, intellectually dishonest, intentionally distorted denialist “absolute crap”:
These people aren’t sceptics; they’re suckers.
¹ According to the SMH: ‘Monckton is also the full bottle on epidemics. Tens of millions need never have died of AIDS, he said. The world’s mistake was the failure “to isolate all carriers immediately, compulsorily and permanently”.’ Yes, Monckton is potty. And dangerous. And as the SMH concludes (and might have said equally of Andrew Blot) “where do they get these people?”
Technorati Tags: climate change, global warming, environment, climate denial, climate denialist, denialism, climate sceptic, sceptic, Insiders, Abbott, Andrew Blot, Monckton, Christopher Monckton, Lord Monckton, Monbiot, ETS, insurance, climate insurance, politics, economics, government, Monty Python, Black Knight, Victoria, Western Districts, communism, communist conspiracy, conspiracy, Menzies, dishonesty, intellectual dishonesty, integrity, intellectual integrity, science, climate science, forecast, forecasts, prophecy, oracle, soothsayer, fortune teller, Tamworth, absolute crap, United Nations Climate Change Conference, IPCC, Copenhagen, water torture, escutcheon, Migently Estates, swimming, values, Australian values, Australian environment, Australian environmental values, global environment, journalist, reporter, newspaperman, blogger
Posted: February 7th, 2010 under Australian Politics, Australian Values, Blogging, Culture, Economics, Education, History, Life, Science, environment, politics and government, values.
Comments: none
|










